![]()
You'd think at the very least Defender would show a warning or something, but no.I found another Linux Application that may be of interest for those who prefer GUI Graphical User Interface Point and Click Linux utilities. The fact that that is still the default setting sort of shows the whole "commitment to security principles" thing is just a marketing circus. I still see "malware" that is just a normal file with a fake extension that relies on Windows hiding file extensions so it shows as a photo or whatever. Leading to "I wonder if fun screensaver will run now that I have updates?" and so on. #What is like speccy for windows 10 installThen months later they have issues, take it to Geek Squad or whatever and the teenager there goes "yep your computer got infected, looks like it was probably because you didn't install updates, see look here is a security update that you didn't install so you got viruses" So the user now knows to install updates. #What is like speccy for windows 10 downloadOne scenario I've often imagined is that you've got a typical user who wants a screensaver, so t hey download "fun screensaver.exe" and run it. #What is like speccy for windows 10 softwareAnd personally I don't feel trojan horse malware is a software security issue but a personal one. That's why most home user systems get infected through trojan horse malware. people are just expected to buy new hardware because Microsoft told them too.Īnd, that is not to overcompensate and understate the danger, but I think the industry has thrived off giving people the false impression about exactly what security compromise entails.įor home user systems, the vast majority require either user interaction or local access. Hell it's the entire prospect underlying Win11 dropping support for older platforms based on "security principles" which is a complete crock of nonsense. Just install it and stop asking questions. in order to keep people "obedient" to the advice of various software vendors- make sure to update, no, you don't need to know what the update has. ![]() I've always felt there are big parts of the industry that basically rely on keeping people scared of hackers/malware/etc. #What is like speccy for windows 10 PatchTypically, they do, so basically every security patch to Windows 11 is a window into an exploit for Windows 10.īut, again, the issues here are somewhat, in my experience, overstated. People take apart the patches for the new OS to see what was fixed, and see if it applies to the now unsupported OS. When Security updates stop, the issue is not so much that they stop receiving security patches, but that new windows versions still get them. ![]() What exactly are the security implications. And I'm definitely not going to be "forced" to build a new one just because Microsoft has arbitrarily decided to cut off support for older systems based on a ridiculous set of marketing principles relabelled as "security principles" that they themselves violate on their Surface line of devices.Ī good question to ask is what is the real danger with EOL Windows versions. I have no intention of building a new machine because this one has not revealed itself deficient to me in any way. My "primary" system is i7 4770K system I built in 2014 or so. I've no reason to think Win10 going EOL is going to be any different. Both are connected to the Internet (being able to access my File Server is super helpful for copying files back and forth) and neither have had any malware problems. I've got systems running Windows 2000 and Windows XP. It's not really accurate, at least in my experience. ![]() ![]() There is this underlying implication that EOL Windows platforms basically get taken over by unnamed "hackers" and Internet Boogeymen once they go EOL. The issues of running an EOL Windows OS are somewhat wildly overstated. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |